Lakelady’s Lounge Rotating Header Image

Society

Strange Timing

I’ve had a few more thoughts about the recommendations of the USPSTF recommendations since my last post. Suspicious thoughts. One’s I thought I’d share.

One of the centerpieces of the current health care reform debate is the idea that there’s a need to be more efficient and effective in our use of health care resources. That there is a need to assess what works and what doesn’t in order to minimize costs. And to have a more universal approach to treatments. (What we have now varies widely depending on where you live). Sounds like practical advice for the most part. But out of this idea came the idiotic notion that there would be “death panels” deciding who gets care and who doesn’t at the end of life. This idea has thankfully largely been debunked.

Now we have a panel that seems to have done this effectiveness analysis on another level. They looked at the data regarding routine mammograms as a tool for detecting breast cancer (not as a diagnostic tool) vs the risk from radiation. Apparently they believe that statistically it’s a wash and therefor not worth the risk.

Considering only raw numbers and statistics I can possibly see how they’ve come to this conclusion. What strikes me is there’s an interesting and rather obvious parallel here. Looking at health this way is exactly what insurance companies do. Raw numbers, bottom line, statistics – that’s how they make their decisions.

So we have here a government panel looking a lot like an insurance company. And we have a great deal of outrage generated by the advice of this panel. I then begin to question motives in the timing of the release of these recommendations – coming right when the health care reform debate is peaking. Is this a ploy to manufacture outrage against health care reform? Is it to provide ammunition for those who want to say “see, you don’t want big bad government interfering with medicine”? I don’t know about you but it seems awfully strange timing to me.


Share

Gendercide?

Through the busyness of my day today I caught wind of the latest report by a group of doctors called the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF). I’m all for improving health care by encouraging better preventive care. Good, well rounded preventative care will keep us all healthier. But the decisions of this group are indeed quite puzzling. Beyond puzzling. They’ve gotten me so incensed that I’m firing off this hastily written post. In case you haven’t heard yet this panel has reversed an earlier recommendation, by the same group (but with different members), and now don’t think women between the ages of 40-49 should routinely get mammograms to screen for breast cancer. The key word here is “routinely”. The don’t flat out say no one in this age group should get them, just that the risk vs benefits should be a conversation between the woman and her doctor and a decision made from that point. Shouldn’t ALL of us be having thoughtful conversations with out medical providers about a whole host of risk vs benefit situations? Isn’t that a sound place to begin taking better care of ourselves? That conversation isn’t the problem. What I see as a huge potential problem is now women and their doctors may face additional battles when it comes to paying for these mammograms. And coming at a time when the country is hashing out the details of health care reform makes me all that more suspicious of the motivation behind these recommendations. If you can’t see the potential problems with insurance companies and these recommendations then you’re rather blind to how insurance companies are working these days. Oh, they might not make changes right away – they’ll wait until the news of these recommendations has left the media news cycle before they do that.

Aside from the issue of mammograms I find another recommendation of the panel even more startling and disturbing. Unbelievably they don’t think doctors should be teaching their patients about regular self breast exams. Apparently they’re worried about the poor widdle women having anxiety if they find something. Excuse me?!?! Anxiety? You’ve got to be kidding me! How about educating women that breast cancer is quite survivable especially when detected early. Or teaching them that just because you’ve discovered a lump it doesn’t even mean you have cancer for goodness sakes. That would go a very long way to reducing anxiety. And I’d sure as hell rather be anxious than dead. Hell, why not teach patients how to deal with anxiety. And I’m not talking about prescribing another little “fix me” pill. I’m talking about proven stress reduction techniques. How about treating women as the intelligent adults we are?

This recommendation is so outrageous I’d almost go as far as to think that this borders on gendercide. I know, that’s taking it a bit too far considering the statistics but come on, why in the world should doctors be encouraged to have their female patients know LESS about their bodies? Unless perhaps if you know less about your body you’re less apt to ask intelligent questions of your doctor and more inclined to buy something from big daddy pharma to fix your problems.

Guess what? I don’t give a frak what this panel says about breast exams I intend to continue to be well acquainted with the look and feel of my breasts. Hell I may even continue to enlist the help of others in keeping track of any changes. I encourage every woman reading this to do the same and every man to encourage every woman they know to do the same too – and to teach your children about the importance of being well acquainted with their own bodies. And you, my not so esteemed panel of “experts”, ought to be downright ashamed of discouraging self knowledge. How the hell is that “preventative” medicine? How do you explain violating your oath of “do no harm”?

The next thing I’m curious about is what they’ll have to say about testicular cancer.


Share

Breaking up is hard to do

The other day it occurred to me that we are experiencing a giant collective case of the breakup blues. I’m not just talking about the banks and businesses that are breaking up. I’m talking about our relationship with the world as we knew it that got up and walked out the door sometime last September.

We can pine all we want for it. We can try to devise plans to woo it back but it’s moved on and wants nothing to do with the way we were. And we’re all in the throes of the breakup blues, not quite knowing what to do next. All of the familiar habits that come with long-term relationships are fractured or missing entirely.

We don’t quite know what to do without the cozy comfort of a consumer society. It was always there to make us feel better about who we were by offering us up the latest whatnot or whatzit. And we’ve yet to come to grips with the idea that we were in love with something that instead of truly loving us back was merely buying us off to distract us from the underlying issues in our relationship.

We’re like a teenager who falls for the cheerleader or the jock not because of who they are but because of an idea of what they’ll make us – more popular, more beautiful, more accepted. We are now learning those relationships can’t be sustained. And what we need to learn how to do is how to build a relationship with the world around us that brings out the best in both of us.

We need to stop waiting around for that call from a former lover that will never come and pick ourselves up and move on. We also need to be patient as we’re learning how to grow up.


Share

A threat to marriage

A week or so ago, as I surfed around the web, I noticed something strange seemed to be happening with marriage around the world. There was an odd vortex of reports that made me question what was up in the world of marriage.

First we have this report from MSNBC where a California man was arrested for trying to sell his 14-year-old daughter into marriage in exchange for a large quantity of liquor and some cases of meat and Gatorade. Unbelievably the man called the police himself when the promised payment for his child was not delivered. (hmmm I wonder if Gatorade will use this bit of free publicity in a future commercial?)

Next in a report from CNN I read about how a major religious leader in Saudi Arabia reaffirms that it’s actually ok for parents to marry off girls as young as eight years old and that those who object are actually being unfair to the child in question. Now I realize that other cultures have different standards but I just can’t wrap my brain around the concept that turning a child into a piece of property is unfair to the child. The idea that to refuse these marriages would cause the child to “lose their sense of security and safety [and that] it destroys their feeling of being loved and nurtured. It causes them a lifetime of psychological problems and severe depression.” makes sense only if you’ve constructed a world view in which women are inherently fragile and men are inherently predatory and thus females cannot survive outside the enclosures constructed by men. If you study history at all it’s evident that this hypothesis is dead wrong.

And finally, to cap off this strange week I read an article from the Times of India where in order to prevent the spread of mysterious diseases two young girls were married to frogs. You read that right, in a full religious ceremony they were married to frogs. At least now I know where the fairytale of the frog prince probably originated.

Now, could somebody please explain to me how allowing two loving members of the same sex to marry is a threat to the sanctity of marriage?

Share

Why this time it’s different

I’ve watched a fair number of inaugurations in my life so far. Sometimes I’ve been excited, sometimes watched with dread. But I don’t know if I’ve ever been so deeply moved as today.

It’s not because he’s black, although I recognize and honor that fact.
It’s not because he’s not Bush, although the relief I and many others feel about that fact is immense.

It’s because he begins with gratitude and because he places the responsibility squarely on the shoulders of each and every one of us. No one person can make the changes these times require. But one can lead the way. And one can reminds us all once again how to hope.

Share

Change is in the air

Sitting here starting to watch the events leading up to the inauguration of Barack Obama I find myself overwhelmed by what I’m witnessing. Words are hard to find to describe this. Just now a thought sums it all up…

On the morning of September 11, 2001 the world changed in an instant.

On the morning of January 20, 2009 it will change again.

Fill your lungs with the fresh air of this change and make it your own. It belongs to all of us  -  as does the work ahead.

Share

A Confluence of…

Ingredients:

Coal ash spill in Kingston Tennessee on December 22
Coal ash spill in Stevenson Alabama on January 10
A new series of television ads against “clean coal” technology first aired the week of December 5
Lack of reporting on the causes of the coal ash spills

stir together thoroughly and ponder the proximity of locations and events

There is something about this that doesn’t sit well with me. Could it be that rabid environmental activists are involved in creating these spills? I don’t know. I don’t much like coal fired power plants but I also know implementing alternatives will take time. And we now have severe environmental damage due to these spills that will likely take generations to clean up. Activists have been known to take similar drastic actions in the past. Think arsons in Colorado, bombing of research labs etc.

Another example that’s got me thinking “what’s wrong with this picture”

Share

Those were the days my friend…

Just testing out a new video plug in. Enjoy this little walk down memory lane.

If you can see this, then you might need a Flash Player upgrade or you need to install Flash Player if it's missing. Get Flash Player from Adobe.

Share

Making sense of voter registration

does this make sense to you…

I just renewed my California driver’s licence via the US mail. Great, glad that was easy since I’ve got travel coming up in my renewal month of October. However, enclosed was a form for voter registration. All that was required was to fill it out and sign it stating that everything on it was true (and that you’re over 18 and a citizen). Uh, isn’t that an awfully easy way to offer fraudulent voter registration? I mean really, do you think that someone who wants to fraudulently register will care that they’re lying on a mail-in form? All that’s asked for, besides name, address, date and place of birth is either your driver’s license number or the last four numbers of your social security number. Give me a break. You don’t have to be a citizen to have a driver’s license and it’s ridiculously easy to make up four numbers of a SS # or get a fake one. Is it any wonder that politics in this country is a joke when we pay so little attention to the most basic of privileges of a democracy.

postscript…

from the back of the form

“If you do not wish to register to vote, your decision will remain confidential and will be used only for voter registration purposes”

huh?

Share

Please read this

In a restaurant the other day I got to thinking about why we say please and thank you and why it matters. How these three simple words, please and thank you, have a subtle power to shape the world around us. On the surface they are simply an aspect of good manners, a societal pleasantry. On a deeper level they are a good deal more than that. In a simple way they acknowledge that I’m not taking you for granted, I recognize you as a fellow human being not a automaton serving my needs. Each and every one of us is essentially alone in this existence on earth and this aloneness breeds a certain hunger to be seen and heard by others. A simple thank you casts a line of connection between us as humans and says, “hi, I know we’re all alone here but for this fleeting moment we are with each other and I’m grateful for that.” It creates a tiny space in which to relax and breathe without the ever present constriction of isolation which is at our core. A subterranean shift that lasts no longer than a shooting star, but one that salves our souls and allows our humanity, our humanness, to grow.

Thank you.

Share